February 22, 2005

Bush smokes bush! (The monkeys are slipping?) First Bill Cosby is accused of sexual assualt, and now George Bush is a coke head? Where are all the role models gone? Next thing you know the rumors of Bush having KKK ties will be found to be true. People where are the family values!?
  • Know who else did drugs? HITLER. *ducks*
  • Wasn't there some hub-bub a while ago about possible cocaine usage too?
  • I thought charges against Cosby were dismissed? Or were they "dismissed"?
  • Drug use. Playing of secular and religious factions for his own means... Sorry, but, just to whom this is news?
  • On second thought... maybe this is some ploy to earn some popularity. "Hey, it worked for Clinton!"
  • Doug Wead. *snicker*
  • Well now that the damage is done to Cosby, we can dimiss the idea, of what a second, I think I mistyped. Hey flagpole I believe your right! Since Bush lost the vote of the fags, hes trying to win back the vote of the black youths, by addmitting that his a wild hip hopper at heart. Should I top that one? Or have i got myself inenough trouble. Hmmm!!!
  • hmmmHe repeatedly worried that evangelicals would be angered by a refusal to bash gays I don't want any kid doing what I tried to do 30 years ago," Bush said in recordings made when he was governor of Texas and aired Monday on ABC's "Good Morning America." "And I mean that. It doesn't matter if it's LSD, cocaine, pot, any of those things, because if I answer one, then there will be another one. And I just am not going to answer those questions. And it may cost me the election." What is he exactly saying here? As the bold sentences could be interpreted more than one way. Like the last one; admitting or ignoring the question, will cost him the election?
  • That first part is really important though: "I don't want any kid doing what I tried to do 30 years ago," It says to me that he may have tried any or even all of those drugs at one time years ago. Seems like he was trying to avoid an avalanche.
  • Why, he's just a regular joe. Sure he's richer than god himself, but if he smoked reefer before, mabye he'll legalize it? Hmmm. And the woman that accused Cosby, said the trial happened in the same court room as the Jackson case. But I think she was on Bush too! To what end my friend, to what end? Leave it to the evangelicals.......
  • Let it go, people...I can understand folks opposing policies of President Bush, but the cocaine/drug issue is ancient history in more ways than one...just let it go already. This is not news, nor is it FPP-worthy.
  • I am letting it go. So I can concentrate on the fact that the Bush whitehouse hires gay male prostitutes to pose as reporters who will lob them the softest of softball questions during what are laughingly termed "presidential press conferences".
  • I still hate Bush and everything he stands for. But yeah, whether or not he smoked weed a few decades ago is less than irrelevant. If anything, stuff like this humanizes him and makes me like him better (I still hate him, but it reminds me he is just a flawed human being like the rest of us)
  • I don't want any kid to try doing what he is doing now.
  • See, this is why "...I didn't inhale." was such a huge deal for Clinton, but GWB's drug indiscretions are swept under the rug: Liberals feel that recreational drug use isn't all that big a deal, so they let it slide, no matter who's the perp. Conservatives, on the other hand, think it's a huge moral deal, and use it to assassinate their enemies. And, of course, they disbelieve any evidence that implicates their boy as partisan muck-raking. It results in a double standard that pisses me off is all I'm sayin'...
  • I think that part of the reason that Clinton was so derided for the "I didn't inhale" statement is because it was a typically appeasing Clinton statement. He couldn't admit that he did it. He couldn't lie and say that he didn't do it. And he couldn't just avoid answering the question. Instead, he tried to come up with the answer that he thought would appease the public the most. It was a cowardly answer, the purpose of which -- like almost all Clinton statements -- was to offend as few people as possible and make everyone like him.
  • I did not have sex with that woman!
  • Liberals lie by, well, lying. Conservatives simply refuse to answer. Re: the sex thing, same deal -- liberals don't much care about sexual misconduct, whereas conservatives, well, you know.
  • In my second-to-last communication I talked about a male ”escort service” operating in DC for the edification of the very senior Beltway people. I have, locked up in my office safe, copies of the credit card receipts with names, card numbers and signatures of: two Supreme Court and one Appellate Court judges {Have you heard about the two judges who tried each other?} eight Senators, five Congressmen, two former and one current White House aides, a number of very prominent DC lawyers, several senior members of the RNC, four general officers and one Admiral, three of whom are still on active duty , five local newspapermen, eight ministers, high level employees of: State Department, Commerce Department, Justice Department, HEW Department, DC police department, NSA, DIA, and most especially, a number of pundits from Georgetown University and a nice collection of CIA people. The proprietor of this stud farm was one Todd Blodgett and there was a front-page story on one of his male whore establishments in the Washington Times. Blodgett was a Reagan White House aide, was fired from both the WH and later, the RNC, for aggressive homosexual behavior and then tossed out of the University Club in DC. Information that has been kept very quiet at the highest levels would indicate that George W. Bush was heavily involved with gay groups while at Yale, had a significant affair with another man while at HBS, was a "very close friend" of a black drag queen and, according to three different inside sources, is no more a Pentecostal Christian than Saddam Hussein. The sex material about our pure, God-intoxicated President, comes from one arrest report and several "counseling" reports now sequestered (by order of Karl Rove) at Yale (Bush's records there have been sealed) There is the temptation to run with this but there at least has to be something factual here. The Republicans are trying to plant obvious lies on everyone in the hopes that others like the nutty Rather will take them up and make Bush look like a wonderful but persecuted man. According to one report, made long before Bush was Governor of Texas, he could not have any kind of sex with women unless at least half drunk and was a practicing advocate of physical abuse. He likes to beat people, according to this. But not be beaten in return. Some of this is not only difficult to believe but downright repulsive." http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=2408
  • Now THAT is some serious gayness! Personally, I envy their apparently prodigious free time.
  • kuros, that's not your blog is it? 'Cause if so, I envision an FPP soon something along the lines of "kuros dies in tragic fire that just happens to take out the office safe as well"... Personally, I did inhale. Several times. I'd do it again, too. (I'm still in college. What's your excuse?) My advisor occasionally tells her collection of grad students "I don't understand why you drink, when pot is so much better for you. I'd smoke it, but it makes me sleepy." What can I say, she went to Berkeley...
  • I wish Bush was a pothead these days.
  • "Next thing you know the rumors of Bush having KKK ties will be found to be true." But what'd be shocking is if he's a closet Maoist. Imagine "Long live Marxism-Leninism-George W. Bush Thought!" Or something.
  • If Clinton had done taken the very logical course of refusing to answer questions about his personal life, Al Gore would be in his 2nd term right now. ps I guess http://www.thenutjob.co.uk was taken?
  • Sould we start on Mao now? Him and Michael would have been best friends. Wait I missed the point. Ok, how 'bout this. Ahhhh! The sky is falling! Klunk.
  • Yeah, let it go, davidmsc. Because stating that your leader is a hypocritical criminal is just irrelevant. Let's all ignore his gaybashing and warmongering, too. After all, he's just a guy who has flaws, right? We can't expect him to be trustworthy or decent or sane, can we?
  • Nor you
  • Don't even start.
  • As I recall, rocket, you're opinion is worth about as much as is davidmsc's.
  • I'm closing this thread. I'm tired of namecalling, figure if I stop it now before it gets any worse you might get the hint.