February 04, 2005

Montana Family Coalition objects to a bill that would make strangling a felony in cases of domestic abuse. The homosexuals have gone too far in hiding their agenda this time!

"Representatives of the Eagle Forum, Montana Family Foundation and Montana Family Coalition opposed the bill, calling it a measure designed to legally recognize homosexuality and create a "designer crime." "The lack of gay activists speaking out in the hearing indicated an attempt to pass the legislation without drawing attention to the homosexual agenda in it, said Harris Himes of the Montana Family Coalition." Those crafty homosexuals. You gotta watch 'em! They are not showing up everywhere! Where won't they be next? I've not seen them in lots of places, but I didn't realize they weren't there to slyly promote the homosexual agenda! Damn them!

posted by ecomuseboy 19 years ago
  • They weren't in my bedroom last night, you know. That may be why I had that dream about Bob Odenkirk and a pan of oyster stuffing.
  • Strangling should only be illegal when the parties involved are of the opposite sex. So sayeth the Family Coalition of Montana.
  • Are there any crafty homosexuals in Montana? I checked my schedule, and thought all the gay craftiness was going down in Idaho this month.
  • They just made it a felony in North Carolina within the past month or so. I went on a strangling rampage the night before it kicked in. I disagree with the law if strangling is only a felony if there is a romantic/domestic realtionship. If it should be a felony at all, then it should be a felony all the time for everyone.
  • *mind boggles*
  • ok i'm really confused. What on earth is the connection between outlawing strangling, and promoting homosexuality? Are they implying that normally, homosexuality is curbed by strangling? And what is this stuff about "extreme ravaging"? wtf someone help this dumb fella out
  • ok the extreme ravaging part was to do with another bill - ignore that bit.
  • ok never mind - i read the linked article, and it makes sense now... ffs - i can't believe some people
  • I feel like throttling some straight people right now, as a matter of fact. Too bad, that they're in Montana.
  • Now I'm hungry for oyster stuffing. Alongside some smoked turkey and mashed potatoes with giblet gravy, you got yourself a good meal there.
  • /runs off to choke a chicken
  • see, we Homos think strangling each other is just a party game, and we want to introduce it to little baby Montanans... We would have gotten away with it if it wasn't for those meddling coalitions!
  • German chocolate cake makes a nice dessert. So does a freshly-baked cobbler.
  • So let me get this straight -- there are gay people in Montana? And the gay agenda in Montana isn't simply to get the hell out of Montana?
  • First off, thanks for the link. Second, Harris Himes, and his lacky Dallas Erickson appear to be doing there level best to disrupt any legislative attempt at treating people as equals. The latest row was during a hearing about kindergarten, of all things. Capt. Renault, the proof that there are gay people in Montana, according to Himes at least, is that you don't see them. (And why would they want to leave? This is a great state, with a few stains.)
  • Oh, I get it -- gays are like WMDs! If you don't see them, then there's no proof that they aren't there. Thanks, Wulfgar!
  • On an abstract level, I do pity these idiots. The amount of fear and paranoia they carry around in them must be phenomenal. Seeing crazy homos who want to seduce them corrupt their children hiding under every bush and up every tree. On a practical level, I'd like to take a drill hammer to their cement-sealed behinds.
  • Monkeyfilter: I'd like to take a drill hammer to their cement-sealed behinds.
  • If homos not being there is evidence that homos support the bill, doesn't it follow that Hines is only opposing the bill to feign heterosexuality? That homosexuals are, in fact, so crafty that they've created a Montana Family Institute to appear ridiculous enough that rational people will lash backwards against them, thus fueling the homosexual agenda? Wait, does saying this make me gay?
  • Talking about cement-sealed behinds...
  • This thread is making me thirsty...
  • You know that time when you thought space aliens were communicating with you through your clock radio? Well, those weren't space aliens, dummy. Those were homos, pretending to be aliens.
  • Which is not to say that legalizing marriage between space aliens would be a good thing.
  • Gays in Montana are just like everybody else here in Montana -- namely, they just want to live their life and be left the hell alone by the rest of the world.
  • Whatever, David. You're just advancing the covert covert homosexual agenda again.
  • You're just advancing the covert covert homosexual agenda again. Is that, like, a closet within a closet? Hate-filled recursion makes me dizzy.
  • Or would covert covert be overt? Do the coverts cancel themselves out? I'm so confused...
  • I think it's perfectly non-self-explanitory as it reads. I think the Montana Homosexual Recursion is a great name for a meme (where the end result is that everyone is promoting the homosexual agenda, through their advocacy of it or their opposition for it). Hmm. Maybe I'll use it again.
  • A bit of good news from Montana.
  • Which is not to say that legalizing marriage between space aliens would be a good thing. Wot! You'd rather they lived in sin?