January 15, 2005

• Ummm...ew? Both the item for sale and the oddly asexual body on display. Reminds me of that thing Marilyn Manson wears.
• [obligatory 'how many licks does it take to get to the center of' joke]
• So...so so so wrong.
• Thought it was going to be a link to someone fucking a woman with a popsicle. Oh well.
• I thought it would be some porn featuring Pops from Speed Racer. Oh well.
• You know, after perusing the site and some instinct, I would suggest this is a site done by a guy with a woman up his sleeve to get the pics and vids of. And the lollies are a joke. Maybe MJ could help me out... but this seems a bit suspect. After following the recent MF post of midgestforhire.com and "Bridget the Midget" to the point of extreme, fun porn this is almost tame. Too tame, if you get my drift. *removes tin-vinyl-leather-rubber hat*
• Ok... I will stop posting today I am still excited about Huygen and Titan I guess...
• Argh, you should check out Superstar DJ Keoki's CD "Disco Death Race 2000" and the his mixing of Alpha Team's Go Speed Go. Speed and Trixie get a little...umm...amorous...with Pops laughing at the end. Truly a masterpiece. Unfortuately, the sample on Amazon doesn't go that far into the song.
• I assumed it was going to be frozen cats on sticks, but this is possibly more bizarre then what i was expecting.
• You know, this reminds me -- I can officially say that I am now seeing at least one vagina on the Internet daily, even if I'm not looking for one. Even doing something as mundane as finding a pic of a phone.
• The internets are such boyzones. Why is that?
• I don't mean to be snarky and all, but being a boy I don't find this erotic at all at all. It's just a weird fetish along the used panty line and I totally agree that it is being run by a money hungry male. Definitely in the category of the most forgetable of the web.
• Just as long as no kittycats were hurt in the process...
• stirfry - Because we're sick pigs. I wrote something long and meaningful, but deleted because I could sum it up in 4 words. Because we're sick pigs.
• Why didn't Willy Wonka think of this?
• Perhaps it's in the Unrated Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
• She must get her suckers and things wholesale, because they're cheaper than store-bought.
• Damn straight, Knicks... where is MoneyJane in all this?! Help us "sick pigs". Is this for real?! *new day*
• I'm wondering what seems non-female here. Being 'money-hungry'? Setting up a web-based business? Sex for money? Many women have, in fact, climbed out of the sleeve of the money-hungry only-boys-can-use Dreamweaver Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!Hookers! patriarchy and are capitalistic geekhos all by themselves.
• So, really, this might be a niche market. And it doesn't end with pussy pops, think about it: ass-pops and butt-chews. I can see the Japanese market really going for this. Think of the possibilities: Pussy Juice Jubes. Quim Caramels. Semen Suckers. Gonad Gobstoppers. Smegma Smoothies. The list is endless. A smart person would hop on this business opportunity really quickly. I wonder how much it would cost to buy up all the necessary equipment? hehe
• Are we doing a Secret Santa this year? Next year: arse-juice-covered chocolates.
• The real money's to be made opening up such a restaurant. The waitstaff will do it all right there at the table. (or on it)
• I think perhaps the net is such a boysworld is because they are such suckers for sex. *snicker* And now the internet gives women the chance to profit without the contact and potential for abuse. Seems simple to me. /and there's even a link for sending tips. how convenient this all is.
• I was thinking the same things as moneyjane. There's something regressive about assuming that a man must be secretely behind this site. Every woman has a vagina. This is hygenic, anonymous, and a presumably easy (though chilly) way to make some bucks. If it is surprising to many that a woman would do such a thing, then I suppose they must still expect women to be Victorian-era creatures of virtue. Unless, of course, there's a man in charge. Then it makes sense, eh?
• I'm not so sure that this is hygenic for the woman involved. As we ladies know, the introduction of so much sugar into the vaginal environment isn't a good thing. (I may have underserved clarity for delicacy in that statement.)
• Monkeyfilter; Every woman has a vagina
• Sugar & spice & all things nice.
• meredithea--just imagine what a yeast infected pussy pop must taste like. Ew. I dunno, as much as I'd like to think that sisters are doing it for themselves on the internets, it seems like most sites with vaginas on display are still run/owned by men.
• Monkeyfilter: capitalistic geekhos
• Sometimes I fart on biscuits! Give me a dollar!
• LOL There was a k00k who used to post to usenet groups who was obsessed with farting on cakes.
• Just in an effort to refute my own claims that it *might* not be a woman doing this, I offer up: exhibit A. And to understand where I am coming from, I would never suggest a woman isn't capable of producing any of this, nor even having it beneath a woman to do so (add own joke), but it seems to be of a caliber that would suggest LESS THAN a woman would produce. I am the first guy to appreciate strong, sexually strong women (I live Portland, OR ferchristssake) and know a few Suicide Girls and many another stripper. But what struck me about this site is its pure cheese factor, heretofor... a guy. But again, I would never suggest a woman couldn't be that lame in an amateurish way. I just have come not to expect it.
• Very diplomatically said, Johnny H. Given the over-all cheese factor and the whole naughty schoolgirl/panties archetype, I too suspect a clumsy male hand in there somewhere. Whoever they are, they have much to learn from superior Japanese technology when it comes to the soiled undergarment industry.
• I tend to agree with Johnny H.'s point. While it's certainly imaginable that a woman would do that, it's got guy written all over it.
• Labia Licks.
• Seeing as how poorly my tractor-exhaust-pipe pops sold I can't see this venture going well.
• MonkeyFilter: yeast infected pussy pop
• Given the over-all cheese factor and the whole naughty schoolgirl/panties archetype Which, presumably, a chick wouldn't be able to figure out sells like hotcakes? Give me a break. I once owned the URL cheatingsob.com, and made the most amateur but sincere and cute (ie. lots of cheesy tiled floral borders and girlie bows all over the damn place) site ever. Why? So I could write in the overblown and gramatically-iffy style of a woman scorned who was there to "help you other ladies in my same situation, so you don't go through what happened to me". The situation being, naturally a cheating husband. And the website being rife with links to sites that "sure helped me, and I wished I would of known of way sooner to avoid the heartbreak". Affiliate sites that, naturally, would pay me for every hit I sent them. Maybe this site is done by a woman - maybe it isn't. But the idea that women somehow don't get how to exploit other people because we are... what? Too smart? Too smart to make money? Above cheese? When cheese pays the rent? Like the Suicide Girls aren't cheesy just because they've stocked up on clip-on rainbow extensions and trucker hats?
• Women have been making a living out of men since time immemorial. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a cunt. Yes, men have exploited women, & it is a tradition in societies dependant on the Judeo-Christian paradigm as a foundation for their shit. In reality, women have always been smarter than men, & in general, women call the shots in any healthy relationship, intimate or not, & that is the way that it should be, because the female of the human species is actually a shit load more cunning & smart than the male. That is all I have to say about that, except I like it that way. Now get me a beer, bitch.
• Monkeyfilter: Now get me a beer, bitch.
• You could get STDs from the lollipops, then that would make the buyer a sucker!?! I know-bad joke, but you could contract Herpes this way, and maybe some others. Just think, the lolly supplies sugar, the perfect medium for the nasties to feed off of.
• Most likely she doesn't stick those damn things anywhere but her face. Unless she sends one to a forensics lab, who's going to claim "That was just orange flavour, not pussy?" As long as they're unwrapped then rewrapped, she's golden. The point with any site like this is to put out the least amount of personal effort for the most profit. Nobody's getting a yeast infection for $9 unless they failed Scam 101.
• I carefully wrap them up afterwards, In fact, this tells me they're probably never even unwrapped, because it's essentially an explanation of why it may seem like they're untouched, but with a scammasterful flourish - what may at first seem *suspicious* is turned into something done to enhance the customer's experience.
• "I know-bad joke, but you could contract Herpes this way, and maybe some others." You sure? There's a reason that STDs have the "S" in them. IF the pathogens were so hardy as to generally survive away from the genitals, they wouldn't be STDs. They'd be "Ds".
• Which, presumably, a chick wouldn't be able to figure out sells like hotcakes? Give me a break. No one said a woman wouldn't be able to figure that out, or be above it. Male or female, it's definitely a scam ... or perhaps scamola.
• I too suspect a clumsy male hand in there somewhere No doubt using it to punch in his credit card number. Ok. If nobody thinks a woman wouldn't be able to figure it out, or that she would be above it, then I'm still wondering what makes this seem an obvious male enterprise.
• Who said it was obvious? It just seems more likely to be male than female. Don't get me wrong; if I had the means, I'd probably do something similar myself. I think it's hilarious. Of course there are women out there who would do this. My point is, there are far more men who would do it. And if it looks like cheese, and it smells like cheese, it's probably cheese.
• IF the pathogens were so hardy as to generally survive away from the genitals, they wouldn't be STDs. They'd be "Ds". If I can't find a way to use this line within the next month, my life will have no meaning.
• It's sleazy sex-based scam site, so it must be run by a male? Give me a break. There are plenty of women out there very capable of this type of thing.
• Sigh. Anyway, I can't believe I'm bickering in a thread about Pussy Pops. Who cares who created the site that sells Pussy Pops, when there are starving children in the world who can't have Pussy Pops? I'm digging myself deeper, aren't I?
• A day without Pussy Pops is like a day without....
• Maybe this would be something if it had an ergonomically designed handle and a conveniently placed bump/ridge on the pop, but right now it just looks like a standard candy pop to me. What next? Erotically marketed cucumbers and electric toothbrushes?
• I think maybe you've got the whole thing "backwards", as it were, PY.
• Hm, I missed the whole point of the page. Gah. But if they were intended more for her pleasure than profit, the improvements mentioned above would be the way to go.
• By the way, I think we should talk about the underlying idea of this. How many people find vaginal, um, secretions, palatable in themselves? Only in a certain context? This parallels the similar semen conversation. I find neither semen nor (dammit! why's there no good word?!), um, "natural lube" (heretofore referred to as "NL") to be particularly tasty. I don't find either to be particularly nasty, either. In the context of sexiness and sex, however, I do find NL to be appealing and certainly not disgusting. Some people feel the same way about semen. Some, I suppose, really like the taste of one or both. I've talked here and elsewhere about "facials" and put forward the argument that, while I don't doubt that for a good number of men (perhaps the majority) the appeal involves some degradation of women (and is thus misogynist), that it's not inherently so. It appeals to me, strongly, I think because since my adolescence I've directly associated semen with my own sexuality and, thus, a so-called "facial", when enjoyed by recipient, is an intimate celebration of my sexuality. More to the point, I think, it's a deep acceptance of something that is, to most young men, an embarassing and messy byproduct of their increasingly intrusive sexuality. When discussing this with other people, most of whom have been skeptical of my perspective on this (not just that this perspective is possible, but that I'm being truthful about my perspective!), I've often mentioned that the reciprocating activity, NL on my face or in my mouth during cunninglingus is pleasurable to me and certainly not "demeaning" and, furthermore, although I've not had a partner who was a female ejaculator, a true reciprocating activity appeals to me as well. And certainly not in any sense that I want to be demeaned. All that said, I have to be honest and say that I don't find these bodily fluids in isolation all that palatable or attractive. I sort of wish I did, actually. I find the "parts" inherently attractive. Why not the fluids, too?
• Damn Pussy Pops! Must they pit us against one other? Must good God-fearing people come undone in the face of their terrible musty power?! Be strong! Turn aside, ye gentle people, from the sticky scourge of thee pussied pop!
• To answer your question, kmellis: No, I wouldn't buy a pussy pop. The fluids are not at all disgusting, but not sexy either. But then, I've never been a fan of the facial either (pitching, not catching). A pearl necklace, however, is another story altogether.
• Clearly, it's sex itself that leads to conflict. Paul was right. Who'd a thunk it? Well, loads of people. I keep forgetting. Silly me.
• kmellis: you sick fuck. As for why someone would buy the pussy pop, it's not the taste, it's the idea. Kunty Kremes.
• God made whiskey but the Devil made Pussy Pops. Mmmmm, Kunty Kremes. But do you eat the yummy cookie first, or lick out the creamy middle?
• this is SO 1996-president-clinton-and-monica-lewinksy's-cigars.
• I may be inexperienced in the ways of the world, but the markup on that site seems inordinately high... is personalised porn really that much of a cash cow, or is "Angelina" pricing herself out of the market?
• This isn't an all female-dominated market. The Guys are getting in on the biz too. £2.50 per pair including S&H. found in links section of PP
• Dong Donuts.
• I think that's what kruellers are, Nostril.
• I don't know whether to be ashamed or elated that this has caused such a flood of commentary. Do we have (dare I say it) another daisy_may/turkmenbashi in the making?
• As for why someone would buy the pussy pop, it's not the taste, it's the idea. Just be sure you're getting the real thing... (3Mb NSFW quicktime file) I'll just say, the idea is attractive, *if* the producing partner is someone you fancy, a play partner. Getting it from someone you don't know, even it it's supposed to be the most gorgeous woman, feels to me like licking a moist, salty handle on the subway...
• Guy's walking down the street when he sees a sign in front of a store that says, "Any flavored Ice Cream - $1". Guy goes into the store, slaps down a buck and says, "I want pussy-flavored ice cream." Clerk nods, goes in the back of the store and comes back with an ice cream cone. "Here's your pussy-flavored ice cream, sir!" Guy takes the cone and walks out of the store. A few seconds later, he comes storming back into the store all pissed off. "Hey! I thought you said this is pussy-flavored ice cream!" Clerk says, "It is pussy-flavored ice cream, sir." Guy says, "So why does it taste like shit?" Clerk says, "Because, sir, you're taking too big of a lick." (old joke)
• Cum Quats.
• MonkeyFilter: Anyone who thinks otherwise is a cunt Thank you! Tip your servers!
• Glazed Glans!