December 12, 2004

• dp
• damnit!
• But we do need more votes. We slipped behind that Munu page I've never heard of before. (Though I am sure they are a wonderful online community too.)
• Does one need a computer to appreciate the point of this?
• I wonder if the guy organising it is fed up with all the nominated blog owners asking to be removed from the competition yet. Meh.
• Lets atart our own damned award. Filteraward.com is available.
• start.sheesh
• Actually, if I had a blog, I'd request that it be removed. Kudos to Heather Powazek Champ.
• Hmmm ... come to think of it ... that Munu group does look WAY cooler.
• i could not disagree less with anyone present Monkeyfilter presents: 2004's category nominations! best monkey? best mofi? best non mofi? best tagline mofi? best tagline non mofi? best header ever? best post ever? best link ever? best unintentional personal disclosure ever? best accidental commentary ever? best de/reconstructed commentary ever?
• Ooh, ethylene, I like it!
• *wails Ethylene: How can I chooooooose?
• Ooh! Much, much more fun!
• I am still laughing about the double entendre of argh's "atart" I would give an award to any tart provided they tarted well.
• Best WebLog Award though - seriously. How can this possibly be voted on in anything like a relevant way? Its like having a worldwide vote for best country and expecting China not to get the most votes... Harrrrrumph. And surely they categories in the Mofi awards should be in the format of: Best. . EVAR! No?
• expecting China not to get the most votes... Harrrrrumph. *votes for Shanghai*
• Wolof, try one of their teahouses! I hear they're not bad :)