April 05, 2004

• That is damn fine. I'm still waiting for part four of this, though.
• Wow. Just Wow. And second DNG on the Mario/Kurosawaness.
• There are no words.
• It was cool but I thought the pixelation took away from it (unlike the movies in the post that dng referenced). It would have been bad ass if the whole thing had been done in 3d like that one brief section...
• I agree with genial. I wish there was a way in flash to easily fast forward and rewind (like with a slider) so I could watch just that scene. The pixelation was more NES-like than SNES-like, IMO.
• Kiiiick aaaasssss!
• Quite seet, but I agree with dng. I salivate in anticipation.
• and by "seet," of course I mean "sweet." But I'm sure you already knew that.
• I dunno. I'm reminded that the movie was kind of . . . boring.
• Yeah, but if the architect had been Donkey Kong, it would have made it a little more interesting, surely?
• Woah. Pity the series of movies is like Highlander: There should only have been one.
• forks - where do you find your amazing collection of mario flash animation? come on, spill the secret. you're making it yourself, aren't you? (if so, hell yeah. keep it up.)
• If luigi is smith then yoshis are sentinels.
• why is he beating up luigi??
• because they ran out of plot
• Christ. It... Just... Christ.
• Christ. It... Just... Christ. Which reminds me, when will be expect to see the Frogger version of the latest Mel Gibson film?
• ...when can we expect to see, etc. Obviously this link was so good that my grammar's gone all potty.
• I think it would be funnier if they did Super Mario with bad porn dialogue.
• Woah mama. The pixels were enough to make my eyes go square. Forks, you never cease to amaze.
• caution live frogs: perhaps forksclovetofu is a regular here.
• All will be revealed tomorrow in a mario-riffic post the likes of which the world has never seen. It's enough to make you put down the sleeping pills, ain't it?