Sin of intent is only venal isn't it? Catechism a bit hazy after all these years. Also, like how the Sun had to mention his weight and employment status. Scummers.
This is one of those marriages whose sanctity needs to be protected from the gays?
And the children. Let me show you them.
Meh, who needs this kind of drama?
> Sin of intent is only venal isn't it?
Matthew 5:27-30 would imply that online adultery is as serious as real world.
Oh, you've looked it up, have you?
A moment of clarity for my 10-year-old self: when I heard a priest talk about these verses I realized that the RCC set its standards somewhat higher than I could hope to meet.
But is lust in your heart the same as lust in her personally programmed online shag-pad? I will await a diocesan encyclical.
I've kind of missed the point there, haven't I? Purgatory it is then...if I'm lucky :(
Can't say I blame himIt's too bad -- they deserved each other.