January 05, 2006
" . . Bush has built a secret system, without enabling legislation, justified by executive fiat and presidential findings alone, deliberately operating beyond the oversight of Congress and the courts, and existing outside the law. It is a national security state of torture, ghost detainees, secret prisons, renditions and domestic eavesdropping. During his first term, President Bush issued an unprecedented 108 statements upon signing bills of legislation that expressed his own version of their content. He has countermanded the legislative history, which legally establishes the foundation of their meaning, by executive diktat. In effect, Bush engages in presidential nullification of any law he sees fit. He then acts as if his gesture supersedes whatever Congress has done. . . Not coincidentally, the legal author of this presidential strategy for accreting power was none other than the young Samuel Alito . . . . . . Now Bush's Justice Department has launched a "leak" probe, complete with prosecutors and grand jury, to investigate the disclosure of the NSA story. It is similarly investigating the Washington Post's reportage of the administration's secret prison system for terrorist suspects. The intent is to send a signal to the reporters on this beat that they may be called before grand juries and forced to reveal their sources."
-
1) Steal Election - check! 2) Usurp power from Congress - check! 3) Invade Iraq - check! 4) Silence the Press - mostly check! err . . and so on.
-
Just what will it take for more than a 49% of the people there to wake up and smell the putrid roses? A video of some higher up eating a baby, molesting a corpse, or what?
-
man, they think he walks with god. Problem is, there is no god.
-
I would like to take this opportunity to link to homunculus' link in the Eavesdropping thread. Also, I have to admit I feel very helpless in the face of this. I've written my senator (many times), voted in all elections, and will vote in the upcoming Congressional elections. That won't do a thing towards getting these assholes out of office, though. I've been hearing more and more how Bush is worse than Nixon, and yet he's still in office, doing whatever the hell he wants. How do you fight that?
-
Just what will it take . . . Well, I suspect that enough "former CIA agents" or "White House aides" that come forward would do it, which it says exactly what they're working hard to prevent. The article makes an interesting point about Watergate - "The story of Watergate, after all, is not of journalists operating in a vacuum, but is utterly dependent on sources internal to the Nixon administration. "Deep Throat," Mark Felt, the deputy FBI director, whatever his motives, was a quintessential whistle-blower."
-
Shut up Salon, you're helping the terrorists!
-
Fucking shadows. They've had it coming for years. Where do I sign up?
-
So Bush isn't dumb? Hmm.
-
Actually, it turns out being a tool for the neocon right is deceptively simple. Just sign whatever God/Cheney tells you and take a long vacation every week or two.
-
petebest, I wonder if even that would be enough. Any one who came forward wopuld just be labeled a "liberal turncoat"
-
Tangentially related: author of a book critical of the Bush administration ends up on the n0-f1y list. Any president worth his salt has an enemies list.
-
Perhaps if enough people are similarly restricted one could start a new airline. Ooh, the opportunities to name that airline are endless!
-
ps--quote came from Stan's link.
-
you BROKE my GOVERNMENT
-
i'm soo sorry <3
-
I think this all is some play by the puppet master (whomever that may be) to lower the bar for what Americans expect moving forward. I mean, I remember not so long ago when I actually wanted John Kerry to be my president! *shudders*
-
> So Bush isn't dumb? Hmm. well, he is, but in a fiendishly clever, evil mastermind type of way. removal of civil liberties, rezoning of the middle east, widening gap between rich and poor -- bush is the mad neocon genius behind it all. but he's also a stupid fratboy with a coke- and booze-addled brain. we live in ambiguous times.
-
Actually, it turns out being a tool for the neocon right is deceptively simple. Just sign whatever God/Cheney tells you and take a long vacation every week or two. And sit around your office drinking and fooling around... NSFW 29Mb quicktime video. Cheap hypothetical shot at public figure. Will offend you if you're in the 51%.
-
I have written to my representatives? in congress. Voted, volunteered, and still these Nazi bastards do whatever they like, and muck about screwing up everyone elses backyard, increasing exponentially the risk someone will actually attack us. Thanks George W. Bush you Nazi Cocksucker! and your little dog Dick Cheney too!
-
roryk: If you think bush is a mad genius or any other kind of genius, I have a whole warehouse full of Brooklyn bridges you may be interested in purchasing via the internet. If ANYONE in this administration is a tool of the neocons it is bush. He is a dolt being manipulated by others. Intellectually I would rate him marginally higher than a sack of hammers. Thank you for your time. I had to get that off my chest.
-
[vorlon]Bush is a three edged sword.[/vorlon]
-
Bush is not stupid. He is simply aggressively opposed to wisdom. That's not the same thing; it's much worse. Things would be far better if he were actually stupid.
-
The fact that Bush has admitted to violating federal law speaks to the fact that not only is he stupid, he's not getting good advice from his advisors. I suspect he's being manipulated to take the fall for stuff that Cheneybot did.
-
Well, according to John Yoo, the US President can do whatever he wants. Quote Cassel: If the President deems that he’s got to torture somebody, including by crushing the testicles of the person’s child, there is no law that can stop him? Yoo: No treaty. Cassel: Also no law by Congress. That is what you wrote in the August 2002 memo. Yoo: I think it depends on why the President thinks he needs to do that. link
-
Palace Revolt: They were loyal conservatives, and Bush appointees. They fought a quiet battle to rein in the president's power in the war on terror. And they paid a price for it.
-
A Legal Defense of Russell Tice, the Whistleblower who Revealed the President's Authorization of NSA's Warrantless Domestic Wiretapping
-
Dayam - H-dogg be slammin'!
-
"Airport Security" by David Ray In the airport I got wanded, though not by a fairy princess. I had to remove my shoes, prove they were not twin bombs. But the strangest scene I saw that day was where random checks delayed the suspicious— the grey lady in her wheelchair and the toddler boy tugged from his mother's hand, pulled through the metal detector's arch. She tried to follow but was restrained by two guards who grasped her arms as she yelled, "But I told him not to talk to strangers!" The child wailed bloody murder. A female guard patted the boy all over, although he did not giggle. I feel so much more secure in BushCo's hands.
-
He's doin' a heck of a job, there, GranNie.
-
Minipax say's we're at war with Eurasia, but Minitrue still has the EAstasio posters up. WTF? Anyway, I think the equation they're using is (Fear + God + Lowest Common Denominator + jingoism) * More Fear = Absolute Power.
-
When the Trust Is Gone Suddenly, it's Bush who is on the receiving end of scathing critiques that he is weak on terror and oblivious to post-9/11 realities. Not once in Bush's five years as president has he gone to Plan C -- a veto. And while Bush threatened one yesterday, using his very first veto in the face of so much public flak would be a dramatic political defeat. Having that veto overridden would be a debacle.
-
Bush's strong support of the Dubai ports deal isn't so surprising in light of his family's many financial ties to Arab sheikdoms.
-
No shit. That's why Toby Keith's new song (very popular at the loyalty-oath rallies) is "All praise to Allah, Y'all"
-
George the Unready
-
White House Trains Efforts on Media Leaks
-
Bush's attacks on press freedoms escalate
-
He's like an UberNixon.
-
Indeed.
-
Now, in the past what the government has always done is go after the people who leak, the inside people. That's the way they try to stop leaks. This is the first administration that I can remember, including Nixon's, that said -- and Porter Goss said this to Congress -- that we need to think about a law that would put journalists who print national security things to...bring them up in front of grand juries and put them in jail if they don't -- in effect, if they don't reveal their sources. I wish he would just eat the live baby on TV already so we can go ahead and get that insane watermark out of the way.
-
Cheney less popular than Michael / O.J. in the "more politics" section, about halfway down 9-11.
-
Commentary's case for prosecuting the Times under the Espionage Act.
-
Hey until they can make time for eating that live baby, why not jail the press? (I hear it's run by the Jews!)
-
Selectively punishing politically damaging leaks
-
All Right, Not All Right
-
Federal Source to ABC News: We Know Who You're Calling
-
Lovely.
-
That one's FPP worthy, IMO.
-
Definately take that to the front page.
-
No way, my last FPP bombed. *cries* You do it.
-
GOP Senators block judicial review of NSA program
-
How does that bumper sticker go? "If you aren't outraged, you aren't paying attention" ?? /-: Y'know how there's always the folks who invoke the "I'll move to Canada if that nutjob is elected, etc."? The Onion even made a joke about it. I now have a genuine friend of friend who has done so. There's humor in this I know. It's also rather depressing.
-
Brian Ross: "It made me feel as if I were a drug dealer or terrorist" Alberto Gonzales considering prosecuting journalists
-
Fellow Americans, do you feel safer yet?
-
Imprisoning journalists
-
SCOTUS Muffling Whistle Blowers?
-
Senators Seek Answers in Probe of Reporter
-
Why the Supreme Court Got It Wrong When It Rejected a Government Whistleblower's First Amendment Claim
-
An Angry Specter?
-
He can do more than send testy letters, surely?
-
Captain Foon: Mr. Spork, what is a testy letter? Mr. Spork: Y. U C?
-
DIY Impeachment
-
An Angry Specter? Apparently not. He's a worm after all.
-
what is it to be a worm? to know the arts of compromise one turns and turns his coat and lies we must remember Specter is a politico before he is a worm, which latter beastie hath an innocent charm in contrast to senatorial poultroons and scoundrels
-
There's a new sound The newest sound around The strangest sound that you have ever heard Not like a wild boar Or a jungle lion's roar It isn't like the cry of any bird But there's a new sound It's deep down in the ground And everyone who listens to it squirms Because this new new sound So deep down in the ground Is the sound that's made by worms
-
underground worms sing like birds bereft of air and light who gargle darkly till midnight
-
Or not! Looks like the WaPo got it wrong.
-
Ah. But Specter is still a politico, and a worm of the second-class.
-
Worm! Yeesh.
-
AT&T: Wired News Is a 'Scofflaw'
-
The worm link makes me want to strangle just about every politician at the Federal level. Kill 'em all, and let God sort 'em out.
-
There is no God. We are alone. With the worms.
-
And the goat on a pole.
-
Prosecute journalists ... or else?
-
Rep. King: NYT Reporters Should Be Charged Under Espionage Act
-
Is President Bush SWIFT?
-
I hope you know that this will go down on your permanent . . record . . .
-
The Bush lynch mob against the nation's free press
-
Did Media Aid, Abet Enemy? Abet.
-
So the whole "if you're not doing anything wrong, you shouldn't mind being scrutinized" thing only applies to the poor. Nice. *Eagerly anticipating the Rapture*
-
Sticking Up for the New York Times
-
Bush Confused About Leaks
-
Froomkin: "But the existence of SWIFT itself has not exactly been a secret. Certainly not to anyone who had an Internet connection. SWIFT has a Web site, at swift.com."
-
Using the Bush Standard, He's a Traitor
-
Do we need another reason to expatriate?
-
Soooo, where are all the cool American expats going these days?
-
Canadia!
-
Or Scotland. My last name's not Campbell.
-
Is it MacGregor?
-
It's Clark. Which clan? ALL OF THEM.
-
There can be only one.
-
What happens when we declare war on Scotland because we want all the shortbread? Where are you expats going to stand then, hunh?
-
The shortbread is likely imported. Follow the money trail.
-
Where are you expats going to stand then, hunh? I'll stand with these guys. I just hope I can measure up.
-
The Colbert Report: The NY Times want you and your family dead!
-
There can be only one McCloud!
-
Chieftan!
-
House vote slaps news organizations The resolution, passed 227-183 on a largely party-line vote, did not specifically name the news organizations, but it was aimed at The New York Times and other news media that last week reported on a secret CIA-Treasury program to track millions of financial records in search of terrorists. Not that anyone's going to grow a spine over it.
-
Conservative pundits reveal murderous plot by the Travel Section of the NYT!
-
Oops.
-
John Dean on Countdown: Conservatives Without Conscience
-
Stabbed in the Back! The past and future of a right-wing myth
-
I found the articles interesting with a caveat. I think there is a legitimate case to be made that Roosevelt screwed up at Yalta. By the time the conference took place he was beginning to decline both physically and mentally. I'm not saying that's why he made the concessions to Stalin that he did, but it didn't help any.
-
If you read the article, it refutes a mental decline on Roosevelt's part at Yalta.
-
Anyone who's seen the pictures of Roosevelt at Yalta will have a tough time buying that.
-
It's very difficult to take pictures of people's minds. ye know?
-
True, but....the fact remains that Roosevelt gave Stalin waaaaaayy to much during the Yalta confernce. The fact was, Stalin needed us worse then we needed him. And yes, I know there's probably some Brits who would disagree with that.
-
Quite a few folk disagree, as may be gathered from this Wikipedia article. Until some evidence from Roosevelt's contemporaries is presented which indicates either mental incapacitation or impairment on his part at the time, the opinions of those holding opposite views are unlikely to change, Berek. Personally, I suspect there were too many people around the president for any such aberration to escape unnoticed and unremarked upon -- the attention of the world was very much on those proceedings. While I agree that historical events need to be carefully re-evaluated by those who come later, and have great sympathy with those who do so, still, there has to be substantiation of voiced suspicions.
-
Lets say I accept the argue that FDR was still of sound mind at Yalta (he definently wasn't of soune body) the fact still remains that he gave way too much to Stalin. One of the biggest mistakes the U.S. ever made was giving military aid to Stalin. That old philosophy of the enemy of my enemy is my friend always comes back to bite you. For instance, in Afghanistan where we supported the Taliban against the Soviets, something that lead directly to the 9.11 attacks.
-
If FDR DID give way too much at Yalta, I tend to believe it wasn't because he didn't have our best interests at heart.
-
For instance, in Afghanistan where we supported the Taliban against the Soviets Um, no. We supported the Mujahadeen against the Soviets. Arguably still a questionable move, but not the same thing as supporting the Taliban.
-
That's splitting very, very fine hairs. We knew the Mujahadeen were anti-western. What was left of them, the Soviets did take quite a toll on them, formed the foundation of the TAliban. As far as FDR having our best interests at heart, even if he did that still doesn't mean he did the right thing in propping up Stalin. For example, I guarantee that Bush thought he had our best interests at heart when he invaded Iraq. Like someone once said, the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
-
> That's splitting very, very fine hairs. no, it's an important distinction. the taliban as a recognizable group did not emerge until after the mujahideen had defeated the soviets and begun fighting among themselves. the success of the taliban during 1994-96 was a big surprise to most observers of the conflict.
-
Yes, but its still true that the roots of the Taliban is in the Mujahadeen. Not to mention the fact that giving military aid to people who were anti-western just to piss off the Soviets was a very dumb thing to do.
-
As far as FDR having our best interests at heart, even if he did that still doesn't mean he did the right thing in propping up Stalin. I wasn't saying it did. But the article was about how the extreme right wing sometimes paints anyone with a liberal view as a traitor who wants to bring America down, and Yalta was mentioned in that context.
-
Psst, TUM, he hasn't read it.
-
The NYT, WP and Time all report the Specter bill as the opposite of what it is
-
Auctully, I did read it. I was making a comment about FDR in general, not in regards to the article. I totally agree that the right is setting up the left to be the scapegoat in Iraq and Afghanistan and now Lebanon. Something I find very disturbing is the historical revisionism of the right. McCarthy has become a noble Cold War Warrior, Vietnam a vital and necessary war, etc. Next they'll be telling us that MLK was an evil commie. I think that Bush is just trying to hold the whole mess together long enough to be able to blame it on his predecessor. It could auctully wrok to the Republicans favor if the Democrats win control of Congress and the White House.
-
I think that Bush is just trying to hold the whole mess together long enough to be able to blame it on his predecessor. The first time I saw that I thought it was a typo.
-
D'oh! I meant successor.
-
I suspect Bush is intentionally trying to break the system of government that's obtained in the US till he came along. This as a policy is perfectly in keeping with the GOP's long-standing aversion to systems.
-
Agreed. Let's all elect a party whose stated mission is to destroy government. And drive SUV's. Yay!
-
Recipients of "Leaks" May Be Prosecuted, Court Rules
-
Sooo, all of us monkeys who looked at this thread are in danger of jail time?
-
So Scooter's goin' down hard, eh?
-
Bush Is Grate Defending the Administration's every blunder.
-
Palast Charged with Journalism in the First Degree
-
Big Brother Comes to America
-
We Are All Targets Now
-
MeFi post on Josh Wolf.
-
The Cases of Lynne Stewart, Clive Stafford Smith, and Navy JAG Lawyer Charles Swift: Government Retaliation Against Attorneys for Terrorism Suspects
-
What the Bilal Hussein detention reveals about the Bush administration
-
The crime of exposing the truth about Iraq
-
At Last! A Cogent Argument For Detaining and Torturing Conservative Bloggers
-
Ugh.
-
By which I mean, of course, that words can't do justice to the utter fatigue, disappointment, etc. that comes from the fact that this word is so prevalent in my culture at all. This concept, even.
-
Roll Call: Dem Intel Aide's Access Restored
-
The feds overplay their hand against the ACLU.
-
A federal grand jury subpoena is demanding the ACLU return a leaked three-and-a-half page document and "any and all copies." Furthermore, we demand the sun be painted a sort of white-and-purple polka dot pattern. Now.
-
The 10 most outrageous civil liberties violations of 2006.
-
Democracy on Deadline
-
You can get on the f@%&ing Terrorist Watch List by delivering an anti-Bush lecture?
-
Payback Time: FBI Raids Home of Suspected NSA Leaker
-
Is the New York Times the Next NSA Leak Target?
-
Dunno, but at least Maureen Dowd is my bitch again.
-
Leak Severed a Link to Al-Qaeda's Secrets: Firm Says Administration's Handling of Video Ruined Its Spying Efforts
-
The war on whistle-blowers: U.S. officials have long retaliated against employees who speak out, burying the dangers they expose. Now, Congress wants to give whistle-blowers greater protection -- but President Bush vows to stop it.
-
Times Reporter Subpoenaed Over Source for Book
-
Government ethics an issue at all levels By PETE YOST - Associated Press Writer WASHINGTON — Anyone who thinks Washington is an ethical quagmire should talk to a cross-section of government employees, who say the problem is worse at the state and local levels. Overall, three out of five government workers acknowledge witnessing violations of ethical standards, policy or law over the past year, according to a survey released Tuesday by the Ethics Resource Center. The Washington-based nonprofit research group has studied organizational ethics trends for several decades. At the local level, 63 percent of government employees observed at least one type of misconduct, ranging from abusive behavior by superiors to bribery. At the state level, the comparable figure was 57 percent; at the federal level, 52 percent. The trend lines in government point toward more misconduct in the future, not less, said Patricia Harned, the center's president. The center says 30 percent of the incidents go unreported and there are too few systems in place for combatting misconduct when it is exposed. One reason for the low reporting figure is that 17 percent of employees who did report misconduct said they experienced retaliation. One in four government workers believe that leaders tolerate retaliation. The state of ethics in the public and private sectors is comparable, in some cases worse. For example, the study said that 8 percent of those surveyed reported witnessing alteration of documents; a similar survey among private sector workers showed 5 percent of business employees had witnessed such misconduct. "Since Enron and the corporate scandals at the beginning of this decade, government has put a lot of pressure on business to address ethics issues, but the fact is that government has the same problem," said Harned. The center says the proven solution to the problem is what experts in the field refer to as a strong ethical culture. When employee believe that leaders can be trusted and when supervisors set a good example of ethical behavior, misconduct is reduced by 52 percent and retaliation is as much as 89 percent lower, the survey found. The problem, however, is that less than one in five government workplaces have comprehensive, well-implemented ethics and compliance programs. The center's findings were based on polling 774 government employees, 1,929 business employees and 558 nonprofit employees. Ethics? We don't need no stinkin' ethics. And Bush never had any.
-
Bill Moyers Journal: Going after the whistleblowers
-
Feds Use Phone Bills to Get Journo's Sources on NSA Spy Program
-
Fmr. Military Intelligence Officer Reveals US Listed Palestine Hotel in Baghdad as Target Prior to Killing of Two Journalists in 2003