In "Who's next?"

I don't know who's going to take the helm of the Democratic party in 2008... but, frankly, it doesn't much matter right now. A LOT of shit is going to happen in the next four years, so who knows what this country will look like by then? I'm pretty sure, though, that HRC would be a horrible choice for a candidate. A certain percentage of Americans would automatically feel uneasy about her being president given that her husband already served two terms. Unfair as it may be, for many Americans the President and First Lady are a team, and such people will say Bill and Hill already had their chance. And if that's not enough to ensure her defeat, don't you think Karl Rove (or whoever else assumes his role) would find it easy to sway more than a few voters with banter about "Hey, she's married to one of only two presidents in the history of this country to be disgraced by impeachment..."? Without even having to discuss policy, HRC isn't a strong bet.

In ""

Weapons of mass destruction = Wars made of suspect notions. Weapons of mass destruction = Stupid son saw no traces of 'em.

Doh! Sorry about the sidebar link. I'm new to posting around these parts.

In "The Photography of Scott Stulberg."

Damn, and I thought I was pretty rad when I hax0r'd Gallery to show three columns on the albums page... This site is beautiful. Really elegant use of flash.

In "Howard Dean Yahoo!s"

If you've never seen the Dean Scream in context, you should.

In "Semantic Simian Savannah"

You on networks do everything ridiculously.

(limited to the most recent 20 comments)