In "Iran and the bomb - how long?"

There's a really interesting article in this month's Atlantic about how with Mutually Assured Destruction gone with the USSR, America's overwhelming nuclear capability makes it less safe: Confronted with the growing nuclear imbalance, Russia and China will be forced to try to redress it; but given America's advantages, that effort, as Lieber and Press note, could take well over a decade. Until a nuclear stalemate is restored—if it ever is—Moscow and Beijing will surely buy deterrence by spreading out their nuclear forces, decentralizing their command-and-control systems, and implementing "launch on warning" policies. If more than half a century of analyzing nuclear dangers and "crisis stability" has taught us anything, it is that all these steps can cause crises to escalate uncontrollably. They could trigger the unauthorized or accidental use of nuclear weapons; this could lead to inadvertent nuclear war. American military preponderance now embraces the entire "spectrum of conflict," as Pentagon planners put it. That is to say, we're miles ahead of everyone in every type of warfare. But if that preponderance is leading to a world in which Russian and Chinese launch commanders are fingering nuclear hair triggers, the game may not be worth the candle. Without any public scrutiny or debate the United States has emerged as the nuclear hegemon, in possession of a destabilizing first-strike capability. It does not matter whether this has come about by accident or design, or whether America's motives are worthy or malign; the condition itself is the problem. The ramifications of this state of affairs are of the gravest significance to America's security—and the world's. It's time for scrutiny and debate to begin.

In ""

I love the Atlantic. By the way, you can get magazines for like 5 dollars a year at places like Magazine Price Search. I get a couple that I ordered through them and the only problem I've had so far is a little junk mail. (I purposely misspelled my name to see who they sell my name to.)

In "Bread"

Wolof, I think he/she was reffering to the fact that hands-free devices are no safer than regular cellphones, although they are inexplicably legal in states which ban talking while driving without them.

In "Blotto."

(Link's having trouble now -- I saw it elsewhere this morning.)

He really does appear drunk there. I don't want to believe that our president is not only drinking again, but acting drunk in public, but it sure seems like a possiblity.

In "Curious, George:"

"Tryin' to quit."

Hesitate, then "Thanks."

(limited to the most recent 20 comments)