June 29, 2004

• Wot? No comments? Not even about the poor little kitten?
• perhaps you'd get more comments at fark?
• kitty slaughter?! for shame!!!!!!! >:o( Even the file name "kitty-gore" is awful. On a side note, the first "...should not be viewed by kitty-loving monkeys" really would have been enough.
• Wot? No comments? Not even about the poor little kitten? On thinking about it, it seems to me that you might be trolling a bit, skrik.
• There's nothing more damning than silence.
• the first "...should not be viewed by kitty-loving monkeys" really would have been enough No way to win, is there? Had I left it at that, I would have got complaints about how I didn't warn anyone, and then people would have photographed my parents' house, sent me all sorts of wierd things in the post, and tortured my cat. Look at the good videos, and leave the bad ones. Jesus!
• I have a better idea: if you want an audience who will lap up videos by sick fucks, head over to Rotten.
• I'm going to put my own head on the block here. Flame away, you veggie animal-activists, you. The kitten was being prepared as food. (Like I said, it was the slaughter of a kitten, it wasn't a torture video.) It is a food-preparation video. I wouldn't eat kitten, but I do eat meat, and all that meat comes from animals that are so slaughtered. If you eat meat or fish, you are responsible for the slaughter of animals to provide it. That should come as no surprise. If you think people who take videos of food preparation are "sick fucks", then there is something wrong somewhere. It's probably symptomatic of society having been taken too far away from the harsh realities of natural life. The first two videos I linked to are perfectly fine, and could be shown on America's Funniest.
• Wot Zemat thot.
• I'm going to put my own head on the block here. The sooner the better.
• I am not interested in entering into a debate, and I resisted responding to this at all, but in case you are sincere in thinking the video has educational merit: No. The videos were clearly posted to shock and amuse, not to educate. It is the pleasure some take in this sort of thing that is objectionable. If the video in question had been a tour of a slaughterhouse and had the post not been defined by its jocular sensibility then you could argue its educational merit, but as it stands the post and the linked page indicate that the contents are linked to provide sadistic pleasure, not promote an interesting discussion about what ends up on our dinner plate.
• Thanks, shotsy. That's pretty much what I thought, what with that filename being "kitten-gore". zedediah, I second that.
• Come on, people, chill. Go pick on someone who deserves it.
• Ha! I just came from that post. all chilled out here (now) :o)
• Kittens are cute. Meat is delicious. You decide.
• Dear God, Queen? That juxtaposition is mainly what makes the cat video sadistic. In a different context without the sound it is merely unpleasantly academic. Most of the other linked clips I had seen here or there, and they all make me cringe. Sadism and schadenfreude are in the air. *sneezes*
• Quiet, xerxexrex, you're just bitte.
• Bitte sch
• Kittens are cute. Meat is delicious. You decide. I... can't... decide... *head explodes*
• I... can't... decide... *head explodes* Kids, grab yer hacksaws- we're eatin' fresh meat tonight!
• sorry. completely uncalled for. won't happen again. (goes and sits in the corner)
• braiiiiiinss...
• It's...it's functioning without a head! How is this possible? Our tactics are useless. We must walk away quickly, in terror!