October 02, 2010
I love this sort of thing - and I think I'm in the target demographic for that SEO optimising image.
and it isn't October 03 in monkeyfilter yet. *sigh* sorry for the double everyone - tracicle, any chance of some time tunnelling, pushing this one into the future?
I'll go to bat for you*, you poor soul.
Com'on trac, cut him some slack. Not like we're over posted here.
*But just this once, hear me poly??!!
Well observed stuff. I enjoyed clicking the link at the end of the article, "Unrelated story from 2007 matched by keyword analysis" and I recommend you do too.
We could add...
This paragraph ignores the fact that the results of the research show a small correlation between A and B and rewords it as A always causes B. (Or if your prefer "B to blame for all A").
And...
This paragraph has an out-of-context partial statistic like "38% of C's in D are E!", without telling us how many C's outside of D are E. We are just to assume that 38% is "a lot". And to be afraid.
...and my apologies to those people who are twitching at "SEO optimisation" - I try to avoid things like that (you know who are...)
and also many thanks for your kind words BlueHorse (just this once I PROMISE!) - I thought I had already thanked you but it's not there so guess I'm just going insane
YAKAWOW!
that you, petes?
« Older My favorite foul-mouthed Scot | Trader of Stories Newer »
To post comments to a thread you must login or create a profile.
